Wednesday, May 6, 2009

Occupation: God

UPDATE: Nathan later scrubbed the word "hobby," because of outcry in the comments.  He writes, "I only meant the word 'hobby' as in something that one does that is not one's career, not as something trivial."

But Nathan, writing *is* my career.  Maybe my ventures will fail and I'll have a very, very quiet career-- and yes, that thought is frightening.  But regardless of who signs my paycheck, writing is my *real* work! 

Nathan Bransford put up an interesting post yesterday about "Writing as Identity."

He said that writing's a hobby.  Sane, sensible people do it because it's "fun."  The people who let the world know THEY ARE WRITERS! are crazies.

Usually, I love his blog-- it's informative while being supportive and unpretentious, and he can be extremely insightful.

HOWEVER, I found this post condescending as hell.

I call myself a writer for many reasons, and writing means a lot of things for me-- the most important of which is definitely not "fun."

1.  Definitions and labels don't exist in a vaccuum.  The point of labeling yourself anything (mother, writer, project manager, whatever) is to give a quick and dirty sketch of the context in which you want your audience to see you.

So, if I'm introduced to someone at a family reunion, I say "I'm so-and-so's daughter/mother/aunt/sister/cousin." Because *that* is the view of myself that provides the best context in that situation.

If I'm talking to people about what I do to pay the bills, I tell them I'm a [day job].

But if I'm talking to people about how I think, how I view the world, what my *career* (as opposed to job) goals are, then yes, I tell them I'm a writer.

Because I see writing as my career, and as an ambitious, career-oriented person, writing is thus the lens through which I view the world.  In many ways, the details of my life wouldn't make sense if I didn't let someone know that I'd chosen those paths in order to further my writing career.

2.  My writing is more than a hobby for *practical reasons*

I actually *tried* to keep writing as a hobby, something I did on the side, and for fun.  Yes, many writers-- even booker prize winners!-- are able to work 9-5, keep up an active social life, *and* write to their full potential.  But I can't.

And once I realized I couldn't have all those things at once, I had to re-evaluate my priorities.  For me, writing came out on top.  That doesn't mean I don't pay the bills, and it doesn't mean I abandoned my friends.  It *does* mean that I rearranged my life so that writing is at the center of it-- where (for me, at this point in my life) a career *should* go.  

That meant that I had to move to a cheaper place, even though it meant living in a basement in a new state.  I had to find more flexible work, even though it meant I made less money and got no insurance.  I had to enforce boundaries with my friends and family, knowing they didn't really understand.  

And instead of the immediate gratification of a paycheck or a ton of fun time with my friends, I got to sit alone in my apartment, learning to write by trial and error.

BUT, it was the best decision for me-- the only decision for me.  Since I've decided that writing comes first, I've been happier, more fulfilled, and more *myself* than ever-- even though every practical aspect of my life has gotten tougher.

3.  Writing *can* be fun.  But I don't write *for fun*.

Writing is challenging, involving, rewarding, satisfying.  Creating fascinating, authentic-feeling and cohesive worlds is *incredibly* difficult-- though it can also be exhilarating, fun.  I think some people *are* called to certain jobs-- and not just creative ones.  People are called to be priests, to be engineers, to be parents, to be doctors.  

Being "called" sounds so mythical, but I think it's just about knowing when something is *right.*  It's like finding "the one" in love-- you've got to be open, and you've got to be in the right place at the right time, and you don't get to skip the intros or courtship.  Finding your calling doesn't mean you'll be naturally gifted or that you can skip the work-- but it does mean that you're certain the work is worth it.  

I was lucky-- I found my calling early.  I was unlucky-- it's writing.  

In some ways, rearranging your life around a calling is like rearranging your life around your children-- would you think someone was crazy or strange if they moved to a less comfortable but more child-friendly place, took a less lucrative but more child-friendly job, and limited their social life to what was supportable in light of their child-rearing responsibilities?  Of course not, because that's a totally normal, healthy thing, *regardless* of how the child "turns out."  A parent's priority is their child, and once you know about the child, everything makes sense.  Including the fact that they don't view their child-rearing as a "hobby," and that "fun" and financial rewards aren't the point.  

Without writing, would I be me?  In many ways, to many people, there would be no difference.  But would I be fulfilled?  Definitely not.  No, I wouldn't actually shrivel up and die-- but that's what it would (did!) feel like inside; when I tried to close off the part of myself that needs to write, life felt empty and so did I.

Yes, I struggled for a long time over calling myself a writer, and I don't assume all people need or want to know that tidbit about me.  However, calling myself a writer has nothing to do with whether I've made money at it (some, not much), whether *other* people consider me a writer (who counts?), or how "good" I am at the craft (how good is good enough?  and how can anyone tell?).  

I call myself a writer because it gives my friends and family insight into how I run my life, the choices I make, the needs I have, and how I approach the world.  I call myself a writer because most of the time, that's the shorthand, the label, that fits me best.

Monday, May 4, 2009

Be Gentle!

UPDATE: Ok, so I didn't entirely ignore the blogosphere :)

I think I've officially exhausted and psyched myself out.  

So:
- I'm ignoring the blogs.
- I'm ignoring the how-to books.
- I'm quitting my writing group (though I may join a new one for scripts.  uuuugh).
- I'm hiding my writing from *everyone*.
- I'm forgetting about the whole query process, b/c my novel isn't fully revised.  It isn't even *mostly* revised.  AND, it's not my focus at the moment.

I've got to buckle down and get solid drafts of both my T.V. scripts b/c it turns out I'm going to France in two weeks, and won't be back until June!  Not quite as exciting as it sounds; I'm visiting family with my father.  But I know I won't have a lot of time/inclination to work on T.V. scripts while I'm there, and afterwards-- whooo, the fellowships will be upon us.

So, I took the day off yesterday.  My goals are modest.  And the only input I'm listening to is my gut's.  

Thursday, April 30, 2009

In Treatment

Struggling through a couple treatments.

Yes, I was writing only the one spec. But... it was giving me so much trouble! And this other show is really cool! And... anything to keep from doing what I should be doing, right? So now I'm doing two at once.

On the one hand, I've found writing a treatment (to me, treatment: a script written scene-by-scene, in story form) *really* helpful. On the other hand, I've also found it really difficult.

Treatment Pros:
My plots and themes are cohesive
It's easier to spot holes and pacing problems in a *story* than a bare outline
Writing the actual script should be fast and fun, and afterwords I'll only need a line edit

Cons:
No immediate gratification. In the end, you've got a few thousand words of relatively tame fan-fic. No in depth dialogue, no clearly visualized action = no fun to write!

Monday, April 27, 2009

"Screw it," says the MC. "I'm going out for pizza."

Ok, so if alcohol's out, how do you show a tough character is in pain? Or any character, for that matter, without being too on the nose?

Usually, when a character is insecure about something in general, it's a good idea to show that character overcompensating for their perceived fault.

Ex.
In the television show Dexter, when Deb feels vulnerable-- even powerless-- after being taken in by the now-unmasked Ice Truck Killer, she works out much too much.

She feels weak, so she works out to become strong.

Exercise is particularly effective, because exercising is usually *virtuous*. It's particular to Deb that exercise is a sign of damage.

And even though I lit into Gossip Girl re: Chuck's drinking, I think his *whoring* is also a good example of a character overcompensating. Feeling lonely and inadequate? Have lots and lots of sex.

But what about a character that's in pain because of a *temporary* circumstance?

Right now, I'm writing a scene in which two characters are in a situation that cuts close to the bone-- for both of them, but for different reasons.

How do they *show* that the situation cuts close to the bone? How do they *show* their pain, when they've only got a scene or two to do it in?

Saturday, April 25, 2009

Humphery Bogart's last words: "I should never have switched from Scotch to martinis"

Like all of you, I was lying in bed thinking about Supernatural.

Ok, maybe not *all* of you, just the ones emotionally arrested at thirteen years old.

The show presses all the teenage girl romance buttons: it stars two beautiful guys with sad back-stories and hearts of gold. And I love it.

But tonight, I started thinking about how important Dean's drinking has become to Supernatural. In the world of the show, his drinking is a sign of: his manly vigor; his toughness; his vulnerability. In short, his drinking is a big stamp of hotness.

Then, I started thinking, of course, that this show comes from the CW. The same people who brought us 17-year old, alcoholic fan-dance club owner Chuck.

And I don't get it. Ok, so the average CW viewer is maybe fourteen. And that high school freshman might very well think of drinking as adult and sexy. But really, writers? I know *you* know that drinking is... kind of gross.

I like booze as much as anybody, but really-- being (girl)friends with somebody who drinks too much is HORRIBLE.

-sweats gin and hogs the bed because he's *knocked out*? yay!
-loses it at a party, but is too heavy for you to get home on your own? yay!
-shirtless and sobbing in public? yay!
-slobbery kisses (and etc)? yay!
-happens to be standing there when he needs to pee, so, of course, pees *right there*? yay!
-Excersists dinner all over your toilet, but is too sick to clean it up? yay!
-has paramedics invade your apt. or sends you on a trip to the hospital b/c he's in over his head, drink-wise? yay!
-pretending his behavior doesn't reflect badly on you? yay!

Not "very special episode" bad, but also not as as cute as pouring some brown liquid in a glass or down a pretty boy's throat.

I'm not saying Supernatural or Gossip Girl has to be a PSA (god forbid). But I do think that having characters swilling it while driving, or drinking *all the time* with no social consequences is inauthentic and (even) a lost opportunity.

Seriously, it puts a different spin on Sam's behavior when you think-- forty hours a week, he's stuck in a car driven by a drinker. For one, it makes more sense that he seems to kind of hate Dean lately (forty hours a week stuck next to a sad drunk?! aaagh). For another, it makes more sense when Sam moans about Dean being weak.

And it puts a different spin on the whole Blaire/Chuck relationship (at least for me) when you think-- here's a smart and idealistic but often self-destructive girl trying to tie herself to a drunk. In those terms, I want to scream at her to run.

Why do you think Supernatural and Gossip Girl shows so much drinking, but so little drunk?

Friday, April 24, 2009

Can't get a black-market script to save my life, and am freaked by Susan Boyle's sex life. Guess I'm just naive.

The only actual scripts I can find to base my spec. formatting on are Gawker's badly photo-copied bits and pieces.

Ugh!

Luckily, the formatting looks pretty conventional. The action descriptions seem unusually melodramatic... but over the top is kind of my cup of tea.

Ok, time to stop worrying about dumb things.

CULTURE THOUGHT OF THE DAY (CTotD):
I know this is superficial, but the most shocking thing to me about the Susan Boyle-diamond-in-the-rough thing is: she's forty-seven and she's never been kissed?! HOW?!

I mean, it's not weird that someone in the world has a wonderful voice-- and why shouldn't that person be Susan Boyle, after all? But I thought *everyone* over age fifteen had been kissed at least *once*-- right? right?!

Ok, on to----- UPDATES!!!

RE: GOSSIP GIRL
Apparently nobody else expects Chuck Bass to (try to?) kill himself. I was talking about Gossip Girl with the high schoolers I work with, and when I mentioned how disturbed I was by his drinking, they acted like I was crazy. Not only that-- they didn't even know what I was talking about when I referenced him being drunk. WHAT?! So I went on the Television without Pity forum... and nobody on there seemed freaked, either. Ok(?)

RE: ZOMBIFICATION OF THE NATION
Since my essay went up on the South Wing, I've been getting great feedback. It feels WONDERFUL. I don't give a sh*t if a guy says I'm pretty, I don't give a sh*t if my friends say I'm nice... but boy, will I kill for some positive writing feedback. I've got to work some short-term projects into my schedule, so I get a bit of that necter once in a while.

RE: PRIORITIES AND FOCUS
Even though I want to launch back into my novel, this is SPEC. time, and damnnit, I'm sticking with my word and working *only* on it. It's tough, but I think it's worth it. Ok, so I've been thinking about places to submit my articles, and yes, I'm getting feedback on some novel segmentes tomorrow from my writers' group, and yes, I've also asked for feedback on my query. BUT, in terms of my writing time/work, it's ALL about the spec right now.

P.S.
Do I cuss a lot? Feel like there's a lot of cussing in this post.

ZOMBIFICATION OF THE NATION!

Here's my article on The South Wing.

http://thesouthwing.com/a/?p=768

And why yes, it *is* the feature. ;)

As you can tell, I've proud of this baby.